FANDOM


good job Bonsly16.

Temp Wingman1 04:31, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Thank You :) But for what lol? Bonsly16 04:35, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

just for doing good work. :) Temp Wingman1 04:53, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

something is off.

something is off with the page. let me try something..Temp Wingman1 05:05, September 18, 2012 (UTC)



the template has some kinda bug in it. i do not know how to fix it.Temp Wingman1 05:12, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah...I noticed that afterwards...I'll let any one of our template designers fix it. :/ Bonsly16 05:17, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

kool i was playing around with it, i think it ight be beyond me. i will leave my sandbox page up as an example so they will know, and see, what exaxtly the problem is. Temp Wingman1 05:21, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Yup I got it to work. Forgot the wikia began to use HTML5, I was using old HTML style in setting up my table. Stupid HTML5 Bonsly16 05:46, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

kool lets go give it a try again,Temp Wingman1 05:47, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

looks good to me.Temp Wingman1 05:48, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Looks good. Any articles with conjectural titles, just put Conjecture surrounded by {{ }}. Got to go to sleep for now. Bonsly16 05:51, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

kool i did tweek one thing on it so they would not automactily add pages to category templates.

have a good sleep, i am out myself.Temp Wingman1 05:54, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Switch to Pendant

I believe that the current episodes that we've seen so far warrants a change of name. Characters have been referring to it as "Pendants" and not as "Switch" so we may have to change the name of the article and perhaps remove the conjecutral template. Bonsly16 03:11, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

i would say go ahead and do it, but leave the Conjecture on it for now. Temp Wingman1 10:15, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

I would agree. Given Rachel refering to them as "Pendants" in episode 5, the article should be renamed. TrowaB91 (talk) 05:01, October 17, 2012 (UTC)

Shouldn't they be called silver gooblies instead due to them being silver. Or maybe hangy things because they hang.150.203.223.120 (Talk)

Wow...Too fresh. I haven't heard any character refer to them as being "silver gooblies" nor "hangy things." So I am right to assume that they are not called by those names. It is right to name them as "pendants" for now as TrowaB91 has said, a character has referred to it as such. Now, "pendants" are not the definite name of the device obviously and that is why we are putting the Conjecture template. But naming them just because they look silver is pure speculation. See, that is the big difference between "Pendants" and the crappy names you just said. "Pendants" are based off of actual information, albeit subjective. "Silver gooblies" are ridiculously speculative information that is based on nothing but mere names used to descredit the reasoning of chaning the article's name to pendants. So whoever you are who posted this, you did the right thing not posting your signature because you just made a complete fool of yourself. Bonsly16 02:17, October 18, 2012 (UTC)s


i agree with you Bonsly, and if an Admin does not do it in the next day or two i will do it myself.

and as for the anon editor i hightlight that edit so other users can keep an eye out for them.Temp Wingman1 10:29, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

SUPPORT changing page name to Pendant. - Bryan 05:54, June 5, 2013 (UTC)

Detroit???

I know where we get the Michigan info from, but why is there the supposition that the data may have "especially" been about Detroit as this page suggests? I saw nothing on the screencaps of the laptop that indicate Detroit has any more significance than anything else, am I missing something? Weiwuweix (talk) 03:39, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you, there's a lot more to Michigan than just Detroit. Ugh. M67PattonZippo (talk) 18:48, October 29, 2012 (UTC)

Two type of pendants.

Ben is shown using something that LOOKS like a pendant and that has a USB port on it. However, this is not the same as the pendants being used to "restore power" locally, unless there was simply a HUGE props continuity glitch which we are all supposed to swallow blindly.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=529856223710668&set=a.492476814115276.132560.100000588861636&type=3&theater

Both images are from Revolution. The top pendant is when Ben is using it as a USB device to download something. The bottom one - who knows when but this is how its appeared in episodes 2-6 - as a solid piece of metal. There are no joints, breaks or seperations to indicate that it seperates in the way in which Ben seperated his.

Conclusion: Ben has been in possession of TWO pendants. one which is a data storage device and the other being a "real" pendant which is used to restore power locally.

Conjecture: Ben is not on the "list" and was not officially given one. Ratchel IS on the list and was given one. However, to protect her family, she turned herself into the Monroe Militia and prior to doing that, gave to Ben her REAL pendant, which he later gave to Aaron. This leaves the mysterious "USB pendant's" location, unaccounted for.

71.82.144.128 23:40, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

Or maybe it's just a television show. 15.195.201.91 17:35, November 8, 2012 (UTC)

Three types actually, Model A, Model B, & Model C. --Revan's Exile (talk) 01:34, November 17, 2012 (UTC)

New Pendant Holder

Bradley Jafee is pendant holder. revealed in Velvet Gloves, Iron Fists preview - http://www.nbc.com/revolution/video/velvet-gloves-iron-fists/1422459

Brad is NOT on the "List" 71.82.144.128 00:13, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

So what if Brad is not on the List, neither was Ben Matheson nor Aaron. Yet they both had a Pendant at one time or have a Pendant currently. The list was never revealed to be the names of those who have a Pendant. Besides the List has 28 names and there are only 12 Pendants. So quit harping on the List as the be all and end all of determining who has a Pendant or not. --Revan's Exile (talk) 00:34, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Number of Pendants

Rachel says there are 12 Pendants but we have any where from 13-17 Pendants. If Grace, Randall Flynn, user 8397/37, Bradley Jaffe each have one of the Pendants currently unassigned then there are only 13 Pendants, but if they don't have have one of the Pendants currently unassigned then there are 17 Pendants. --Revan's Exile (talk) 01:42, November 17, 2012 (UTC)

I agree because there are multiple pendants that are known about the name of the article being called The Pendant is no longer suficent the Artical here should be renamed to Pendants. Promethius20 (talk) 03:46, February 1, 2013 (UTC)`


Temp Wingman1 03:50, February 1, 2013 (UTC)

spell checked

Images

Would more images of the pendant be able to be added?  There are a lot of the wikia, like the laptop image from the pilot episode, or Monroe holding the pendant. 64.234.70.170 18:32, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

go for it. nbc.com mighr have some.Temp Wingman1 21:18, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Destroyed Pendant?

Does anyone know if the pendant on the blown helo was the one originally carried by Ben/Aaron or Bradley? --Revan's Exile (talk) 02:55, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

i dont know for sure but i think it was. i am also not sure it was destroyed,Temp Wingman1 02:57, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

I doubt that it was destroyed; remember when we saw Miles try to break Aaron's Pendant in Ties That Bind? He wailed on it with the hilt of his sword and only managed to dent the cement underneath it.  Granted, that was with a sword as opposed to an explosion, but just a thought. As for whose Pendant was in the chopper, I have no idea.  M67PattonZippo (talk) 11:45, March 30, 2013 (UTC)

Humvee Pendant

Which pendant should we now list as being under the controll of the rebellion? --Revan's Exile (talk) 02:18, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

none Rachel distroyed it!Temp Wingman1 02:26, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Still need to edit to reflect the latest one destroyed by Rachel Matheson. --Revan's Exile (talk) 02:30, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.